Your rubric sets the standard.
Define expected reasoning, partial credit, and marking criteria before evaluation begins.
Upload scanned answer sheets with your marking criteria. Get question-wise marks, clear feedback and expert review. You decide when to release results.
AI assists. Educators decide.
Plants use sunlight to turn carbon dioxide and water into glucose and oxygen.
“Sunlight” meets the rubric. The expert restores one mark and records why.
AI intelligence + human judgment Collective intelligence.
Built with educators.
Learning from real copies.
Early activity, with formal accuracy benchmarks still ahead.
Explore the evidenceYour institution supplies the copies and rubric. SuhiMark completes the evaluation. Choose how expert review enters the process.
Student-linked scans, question paper, reference answers and a fixed rubric.
Question-wise marks and useful feedback, with evidence, totals and uncertainty checks.
A subject expert inspects the evidence, adjusts marks or feedback where needed, and approves the current version.
Question-wise marks, reasons, improvement feedback and a checked-copy PDF.
Turnaround depends on paper length, scan quality and review needs. Explore your subject and service scope during onboarding.
A total score can hide the useful part: what a student understood and what needs work. Explore how the answer, rubric, and educator’s judgment come together.
Unclear writing needs confirmation before it supports a mark.
An illustrative sample, using prepared content. No live model or student paper is processed here.
The AI has proposed a mark. Would you keep it? Inspect the answer and the rubric, then make the decision yourself.
Try the review room No sign-up. No student data. Your judgment leads the example.Explore the V7 architecture →“Plants use sunlight…”
See AI and AI+ in action: from student-linked scans to completed feedback, expert resolution and institution-controlled release.
The film uses on-screen text and music, with illustrative workspaces and sample marks. Here is the same process in words.
The public examples do not process live student papers. Explore a sample review or inspect architecture and implementation status.
The goal is simple: help educators review with context and help students understand what to do better.
Define expected reasoning, partial credit, and marking criteria before evaluation begins.
Connect each question to the student’s answer, awarded marks, strengths, and a specific next step.
Keep scanned answers, checked reports, and review status associated with the correct student ID.
Review the completed copy, request refinements, and choose when students and parents receive results.
Encouraging for practice. Balanced for revision. Exam-focused for preparation. Explore how the same feedback can meet different learning needs.
Marking rules belong in your rubric. Agree on partial credit, required steps and accepted methods before evaluation. Apply the same rules to every copy.
Change the feedback tone. Keep the marks unchanged.
Correct inputs, products, and role of sunlight. The energy conversion is not explained. Add that light energy becomes chemical energy stored in glucose to meet the final criterion.
Planned feature · Try the preview. These prepared examples change the wording, never the score. No live assessment runs here.
From a tutor’s batch to a college department, the workflow keeps student records, assessment, and release decisions connected.
Discuss your institutionA 30-minute conversation about your assessment needs.
Keep student IDs, batch uploads, review status, and checked copies together. Give every paper a clear path to release.
Bring department-specific rubrics and examiner oversight into a common review process, with academic ownership preserved.
Make marking criteria visible and feedback actionable. Keep your attention on how students can improve.
Students see results after publication. Parent reports are sent only when the institution enables and approves delivery.
Educator feedback from our early work. Explore each perspective at your own pace.

Operating Head, ICT Computer Centre, Dumka
“From the operations side, evaluation creates more follow-up work than people usually notice. SuhiMark makes that workflow cleaner and easier to manage, which can save faculty time and reduce unnecessary pressure during assessment periods.”

Principal, S.R.T. College, Dhamri, Godda
“For a college, evaluation is not just about checking answers—it also demands consistency and faculty time. After using SuhiMark, I found the process far more manageable. It can reduce routine checking effort and give faculty more time for students and academic work.”

Founder & Tutor, ArthMarg
“My schedule is usually split between teaching, management, and building ArthMarg. Copy checking often becomes the work that follows you after classes. SuhiMark genuinely made that part easier and saved time I could put back into students and the institute.”
Turn each day’s learning topic into a focused practice quiz. A small check-in to help students discover what clicked—and what needs another look.
What did you learn today?
Clear answers to the things institutions ask first.
Ask us something else ↗In AI, clear copies complete after automated evaluation and quality checks. If an answer or question is uncertain, the affected copy goes to a SuhiMark subject expert before handover. In AI+, experts audit every question in every copy. Your institution decides when to publish in both modes.
The planned Encouraging, Balanced and Exam-focused styles change how feedback is explained. They do not change marks. Marking strictness belongs in the assessment rubric: partial credit, required steps and accepted methods are agreed before evaluation and applied consistently to every copy.
The question paper, official answers, marking rubric, and scanned answer sheets linked to student IDs. During a demo, we can discuss your subjects, copy formats, and review requirements.
Yes. The intended workflow lets institution teachers send clarification or improvement requests to the SuhiMark specialist team before publishing. A discussion does not silently change the awarded marks.
Parent delivery is controlled by the institution. Parent email can be required by institutional policy, and sending the checked report depends on the institution’s release and delivery approval.
Watch the product demonstration, explore the public sample journey, or book a 30-minute walkthrough. The workbench preview requires an invitation. The SIH page explains the architecture, implemented foundations, and remaining validation work.
Daily topic quizzes are coming soon. The interactive cards on this page are prepared examples of the planned experience: choose the day’s topic, have a teacher review the quiz, and give students focused practice.
Choose what you’d like help with. Review your message in WhatsApp before sending.
General enquiries only. Please don’t send student papers, marks, passwords or identity documents. Privacy details